Worth it Beauty Tools Solid signal

Foreo Luna 4: The Silicone Splurge That Earns Its Keep

A sonic silicone cleansing device that wins hearts with gentle exfoliation, no replacement heads, and a massage mode — if you can stomach the price.

G
By Glow · your honest beauty editor
· Published Recently · 158 real voices · 10 videos
Foreo Luna 4
Product still · Foreo Luna 4

What real owners actually say

The user comments paint a picture of genuine loyalty — but not uncritical love. One long-term Foreo user with super-sensitive, retinol-dried skin calls it 'just enough exfoliation to feel soft but not red and sore,' though she's candid that it 'doesn't make my face feel super extra clean.' She learned the hard way that four times a day was a terrible idea — 'my skin hurt soooooooo bad' — and settled on twice daily. Another user who has owned both Foreo and Clarisonic prefers the Foreo for being gentler, more hygienic (antibacterial silicone, no nylon bristles), longer-lasting on a single charge, and crucially: no replacement heads to buy ever. That last point comes up repeatedly as the real differentiator, since Clarisonic owners gripe about $40 for a two-pack of heads every three months. A third user echoes this: 'almost never have to charge it, you don't need to buy replacement heads, and it doesn't cause micro tears.' Two years of daily use and still going. For oily skin types who wear a lot of makeup, one user says the Foreo's ability to clean it all off is 'the biggest plus.' The thread itself is mostly about building a beauty advent calendar, so the Luna mentions are organic and unprompted — these are people who love their device enough to recommend it to a stranger.

What Glow loved

  • No replacement heads needed — ever — saving ongoing costs versus brush-based competitors
  • Antibacterial silicone is gentler and more hygienic than nylon bristles
  • Long battery life; users report rarely needing to charge
  • Adjustable intensity suits sensitive to oily skin types
  • Effective at blackhead removal and makeup cleansing

What Glow didn't

  • Premium price point that multiple users question versus the Luna 3
  • Reported charging issues — missing chargers, defective plugs out of the box
  • Can cause skin pain if overused; not idiot-proof for beginners
  • May not deliver a dramatically 'extra clean' sensation for those expecting a deep scrub
  • Unclear differentiation between Luna 3 and Luna 4 leaves buyers wondering if the upgrade is worth it

The YouTube reviewers who actually tried it

Across ten YouTube reviews, the Luna 4 is repeatedly praised for softness — 'even softer than it looks' is a near-verbatim sentiment. Reviewers and commenters highlight effective blackhead removal and visible pore-minimizing, with one commenter calling it 'magic.' The adjustable intensity is appreciated for catering to different skin sensitivities. The firming massage mode gets specific love from Peaches Skin Care, who recommends using it after cleansing. The travel lock is called out as a smart design detail. However, there's a persistent thread of confusion about what actually changed between the Luna 3 and Luna 4 — multiple commenters ask directly, and some conclude the Luna 3 Plus 'makes more sense.' Charging issues surface repeatedly: 'mine didn't come with a charger,' 'the charging plug does not go all the way in,' 'there was no charge in my box.' One commenter notes the Luna 4 Plus requires 21 minutes of LED light therapy, which feels like a time commitment to some. The consensus across reviewers: enjoyable, effective, a skincare routine upgrade — but whether you NEED it versus just WANT it is an open question, as TheBeautyBreakdown's title itself asks.

Do You NEED these Facial Cleansing Devices? | LUNA 3 vs LUNA 4 review
@TheBeautyBreakdown · 82,701 views · 542,000 subs
Glow's pick
Where the stories disagree

The caveats nobody puts on the bottle

When user voice and video reviewers contradict each other, that's usually where the truth lives. Here's the disagreement.

  • USER comments emphasize 'no replacement heads to buy' as the top selling point over Clarisonic, but VIDEO commenters repeatedly report missing chargers and charging defects — quality control issues the brand wouldn't market.
  • VIDEO reviewers praise the Luna 4's softness and new features, but multiple commenters across several videos question whether the upgrade from Luna 3 justifies the cost — the differentials remain unclear even to engaged viewers.
  • USER owners with sensitive skin praise gentleness, but one USER candidly admits overuse caused pain — the device's effectiveness is dose-dependent and not foolproof, something marketing never warns about.
  • VIDEO commenters love the results ('magic' blackhead removal, pore minimizing), yet USER comments are more measured — one explicitly says it 'doesn't make my face feel super extra clean' — revealing a gap between reviewer enthusiasm and long-term owner realism.
  • BRAND layer is entirely missing, so no official claims can be verified or challenged — all signals come from users and reviewers only.
Watched & read

The 10 videos that informed this verdict

Top YouTube reviews ranked by views. Tap a card to watch on YouTube — no autoplay, no creep tracking, no “you might also like.”