Aveda Nutriplenish Hydrating Shampoo
A superfood-infused hydrating shampoo that generated real curiosity on video — but the user comment thread barely mentions it, favoring Pureology and Redken…
What real owners actually say
Here's the awkward truth: the user comment section barely talks about Aveda Nutriplenish at all. Instead, these commenters — overwhelmingly people with long, color-treated, coarse, or blonde hair — are out here evangelizing Pureology Strength Cure, Redken Mega Soft, and Shea Moisture's Manuka Honey line. Pureology in particular comes up again and again as the holy grail for bleached and color-treated hair, with people raving about detangling, softness, and shine — then nearly fainting at the price. Multiple commenters justify the cost by noting the bottles last ages, which softens the blow. There's a strong consensus that salon-grade haircare genuinely outperforms drugstore for damaged, heat-styled, or chemically treated hair. One person put it perfectly: they'll cheap out on makeup and perfume, but not shampoo. The thread also spirals into a very detailed chlorine-and-pool discussion — chelating shampoos, Malibu C crystals, swim caps, baking soda pastes — which has nothing to do with Aveda but tells you this audience is problem-solving, not brand-loyalty shopping. The absence of Aveda Nutriplenish from these organic recommendations is itself a signal: when people with dry, damaged hair list their favorites unprompted, this product simply didn't make the cut.
What Glow loved
- Contains appealing naturally-derived ingredients (pomegranate oil, coconut oil, mango butter)
- Brand offers a 'light moisture' variant, suggesting options for different hair weights
- Generated interest from curly-hair communities in video comments
- The overnight serum in the same line got genuine praise from someone with relaxed hair
What Glow didn't
- Virtually absent from organic user recommendations — real people with dry/damaged hair name Pureology and Redken instead
- Video reviews are largely brand-produced or from very small channels with minimal engagement
- Open question whether the range adequately serves curly and coily hair types
- No substantive user testimony about actual washing experience, scent longevity, or lather quality
- Skepticism about whether premium haircare pricing is justified pervades even the product's own video comment sections
The YouTube reviewers who actually tried it
The video landscape is thin but more Aveda-specific. Swavy Curly Courtney (203K subs) did a full 'Is it worth the hype?' review, and the comments on that video are revealing — one viewer bluntly said they refuse to believe 'you get what you pay for' with haircare and that a lot of high-end product is just marketing, which is a real undercurrent of skepticism. Others praised Courtney's reviewing style more than the product itself. Aveda's own channel posted promo videos showcasing the Nutriplenish line for day-to-night hydration, and one commenter raved about the overnight serum on relaxed hair. Alfonzo Chavez highlighted it for curly hair styling, with a viewer commenting about naturally curly, dry hair needing 'the good moisture.' The Escentual channel ran a 30-day team trial, but a viewer complained there weren't enough curly-haired testers — questioning whether the range only covers 'light moisture.' The Beautyistic review noted the shampoo features pomegranate oil, coconut oil, mango butter, and is 94% naturally derived, but the view count was tiny (29 views). Overall, the video presence exists but leans heavily on brand-produced content and smaller creators. No crushing takedown, but no passionate grassroots defense either.
The caveats nobody puts on the bottle
When user voice and video reviewers contradict each other, that's usually where the truth lives. Here's the disagreement.
- USER comments are dominated by Pureology and Redken love — Aveda Nutriplenish is conspicuously absent from organic recommendations, while VIDEO content exists specifically for the product but mostly from the brand itself or small creators.
- VIDEO commenter skepticism ('a lot of high-end haircare is only for marketing') directly challenges the implicit USER consensus that salon-grade products are always worth the premium.
- USER commenters rave about Pureology's detangling and softness for color-treated hair; VIDEO coverage of Nutriplenish doesn't generate the same unprompted enthusiasm, suggesting it hasn't earned the same word-of-mouth loyalty.
- VIDEO viewer questioned whether the range serves curly hair types adequately — noting the Escentual trial lacked curly representation and appeared focused on 'light moisture' only.
- Both BRAND and INTERNET layers are completely empty, meaning any assessment rests on indirect user chatter and low-view-count video reviews — a genuinely thin evidence base.
The 10 videos that informed this verdict
Top YouTube reviews ranked by views. Tap a card to watch on YouTube — no autoplay, no creep tracking, no “you might also like.”